Document alignment0%
Private by default
Job–Resume Evidence Matcher v3.1
Text stays in this browser
Step 01
Add the job advertisement
Include responsibilities, required qualifications, and preferred qualifications.
Upload job adPDF, DOCX, or TXT · 5 MB max
No file selected
Step 02
Add the resume
Use the version you would actually submit for this role.
Upload resumePDF, DOCX, or TXT · 5 MB max
No file selected
What the score means: document readiness, not candidate quality or hiring probability.
Initial production scope: professional and knowledge-work roles. Clinical licensing, trades, public-safety, and clearance-heavy roles require manual verification.
File parsing: pasted text and TXT are dependency-free. PDF and DOCX require an internet connection to load pinned parser libraries; your document text remains in the browser.
Parsing requirements and roles, resolving demanded facets, scoring evidence depth, and building an auditable match map…
Your report
Document alignment and evidence map
!
Possible screening outcome
Pending
This is a document-based warning, not a prediction. "Not shown" does not necessarily mean "not qualified."
Hard filters found in the job ad
Minimum experience, education, credentials, and eligibility conditions
Required coverage0%
Coverage of must-have qualifications.
Depth alignment0%
Autonomy, complexity, scope, repetition, and outcomes compared with the job expectation.
Demanded-facet coverage0%
Only facets actually requested by the employer are included in the denominator.
Evidence depth0%
Strength of role-linked evidence, weighted by source type, recency, scope, and outcomes.
Employer language0%
Accurate use of the employer's terminology where the evidence supports it.
Analysis confidence0%
Confidence in requirement extraction, document parsing, and evidence linkage.
Why this score?
Requirement-level contribution ledger
Largest strengths
Requirements contributing the most readiness points.
Largest deductions
Highest weighted points currently unavailable and why.
Human-in-the-loop: Open any requirement to confirm a defensible match, reject an incorrect inference, or ignore a requirement that is not relevant. Scores recalculate immediately.
01
Wording gaps
Relevant evidence exists but uses different terminology.
02
Depth gaps
Intensity or cluster strength is below the job's requirement level.
03
Qualification gaps
No defensible support found. Do not solve by inserting keywords.
Demanded-facet breakdown
Only employer-requested facets are scored. Green = direct evidence, blue = transferable evidence, gray = unsupported.
Transferability connections used
Directional same-family or adjacent skills that supplied limited—not exact—credit.
Composite skill decompositions
Multi-concept requirements broken into component skills.
Unmapped dynamic phrases
Repeated phrases in the job text not absorbed into the skill graph.
Truth check: Revision impact is the maximum document-readiness points recoverable from existing evidence—not a prediction of ATS or hiring results. Add facts only when verifiable.
Demand versus proof
Employer concepts, reference frequency, and evidence quality
Repeated words do not automatically increase fit. Independent job references establish demand; role-linked accomplishments establish proof.
| Employer concept | Job demand | Resume proof | Fit | Recommended action |
|---|
How it works
Requirements and evidence become auditable vectors—not keyword piles.
v3.1 separates the exact facet an employer requests from related tools in the same family, then explains every score through job-demand frequency, resume-proof strength, depth, context, and employer language. Revision priorities consume the same requirement records, so every recommendation links back to a source sentence and a measurable deduction.
1Parse
Job clauses and resume bullets retain their source, role, date, action, context, and priority.
2Resolve
Demanded facets match first; semantic equivalents, same-family tools, and adjacent skills receive progressively less credit.
3Profile
Evidence is scored across exposure, autonomy, complexity, scope, outcomes, recency, and source strength.
4Correct
Every conclusion is source-linked and can be confirmed, rejected, or ignored before export.
Important limits
This tool improves documents. It does not evaluate people.
No ATS simulation
Employer systems, configurations, and human review practices differ.
No rejection probability
Warning flags only explicit filters. No prediction of employer decisions.
No candidate ranking
Designed for an applicant comparing their own documents.
No invented experience
Missing qualifications stay visible. Revision suggestions require truthful completion.
FAQ
Before you use the report
A demanded facet is the specific sub-competency named by the employer. If the job requests AWS, only AWS is scored as the direct facet. Azure or GCP may receive limited transferable credit, but they cannot be labeled exact.
The depth profile compares exposure, autonomy, complexity, scope, repetition, and outcomes. A resume can therefore show strong execution but still have a scope gap, or strong outcomes but insufficient evidence of ownership.
The matcher distinguishes semantic equivalents, same-family tool transfer, and broader adjacent skills. Transfer is directional and capped. A related tool or neighboring competency may reduce a gap, but it never proves the exact requested skill.
The job ad contains an explicit minimum or eligibility condition that the resume appears not to support or falls below. It is a prompt to verify the requirement—not a claim that an ATS or employer will reject the application.
Supported files are read in the browser. TXT and pasted text work without an external parser. PDF and DOCX parsing requires an internet connection to load pinned PDF.js and Mammoth libraries; document text is still processed in the browser and is not uploaded or stored. Analytics events never contain document text, names, or filenames.
Complete professional workflow system
Turn the match report into a truthful application workflow
Sovereign OS adds the four core systems — Research, Studio, Content, and Multi-AI — including prompt design, document revision, and interview preparation workflows. One payment, permanent access.
Free AI Research Starter Kit
4 workflows + 4 reusable prompts
Build better source-grounded AI workflows beyond one application. Free, instant access.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.