Why this works: This prompt applies all four principles of effective NotebookLM prompting to emotional data. It specifies format (five-part structure per trigger), constrains scope (all entries, but organized by frequency), adds reasoning instructions (behavioral terms, percentage, trajectory over time), and naturally leads to follow-up questions about any trigger that surprises you. The five-part structure prevents NotebookLM from giving vague summaries like "you seem stressed sometimes" and forces it to ground each trigger in your actual language and behavior.
What to expect: In testing, this prompt reliably surfaces 2–3 triggers the writer consciously recognizes and 1–2 they don't. The most common surprise: triggers that appear across contexts the writer thought were completely separate (e.g., the same feeling of being "not heard" appearing in work meetings, family dinners, and romantic conversations). The trajectory component (#5) is particularly valuable — many people discover that a trigger they thought was getting worse is actually stable, or that one they'd dismissed is quietly intensifying.
Follow-up: Pick the trigger that surprises you most and ask: "Focus only on entries related to [trigger]. What was happening in my life each time this appeared? Is there a pattern in what happens before and after?"